Fundraising Content Creation

An appeal isn't just a request for donations—it's about creating experiences that donors treasure. It's crucial to understand that we're not asking donors to support our mission; instead, we're aiding them in fulfilling their vision of a better world. Here’s how we make donating a joyful and meaningful act: 1. 𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞: Shift the focus from needs to highlighting opportunities for donors to make significant changes in the world. 2. 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭: Provide donors with intimate insights and special access to see the impact of their contributions firsthand, making them feel like integral parts of our journey. 3. 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Move beyond standard acknowledgments. Customize your gratitude to reflect the unique impact of each donor’s contribution. 4. 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐭 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬: Share powerful stories that illustrate the direct results of their generosity, portraying donors as the heroes of these narratives. We have the power to transform giving into an enriching experience, elevating our donors from mere supporters to valued partners in a shared mission. By engaging donors meaningfully, we celebrate and support their aspirations to improve the world.

The #1 reason most youth sports fundraisers fail? They don’t tell a story. Families get asked to sell raffle tickets, candy bars, car wash vouchers But they have no idea why. It’s just another task on top of everything else. So they do the bare minimum… or nothing at all. Here’s the reality: 👉 Parents don’t fundraise for programs. They fundraise for kids. 👉 Communities don’t open their wallets for “general funds.” They give when they know what’s at stake. 👉 Sponsors don’t back logos. They back impact. And when directors fail to connect dollars to impact, here’s what happens: - Parents burn out and stop participating. - Sponsors ghost you after one season. - Kids drop out because the money never actually lowered fees. That’s not a fundraiser. That’s a hidden tax on families. The solution? Build fundraisers on stories that matter. Here’s how to make it concrete this season: ✅ Step 1: Tie every dollar to a visible outcome. Not “we need $5,000.” Say: “This drive keeps 12 kids on the field who otherwise couldn’t play.” Instead of “help us travel.” Say: “Your $50 gets our team to the state championship.” ✅ Step 2: Put faces to the impact. Feature real kids (with permission). Post a progress tracker that shows exactly how many players are funded. Create a visual scoreboard people can rally behind. ✅ Step 3: Equip families with the script. Parents hate being salespeople. Make it easy: “We’re raising money so every kid in our community can play, no matter their family income.” That’s a story anyone can share, in person, by text, or on social. ✅ Step 4: Close the loop. At the end, tell everyone what happened. - “Because of you, 15 kids played this season.” - “Because of you, travel costs dropped by 30%.” - “Because of you, we bought new uniforms without raising fees.” Public gratitude = long-term trust. ✅ Step 5: Systematize it. Write down the playbook, save the scripts, and reuse them next season. Sustainable fundraising comes from systems, not one-offs. Here’s the hard truth: If your fundraiser feels like work with no payoff, it’s not fundraising, it’s family draining. The strongest directors don’t just collect money. They rally people around a mission. — 🧠 Want real-world strategies for building sustainable, culture-driven programs? Subscribe to Grow the Game, your leadership playbook for youth sports: 👉 https://lnkd.in/gFwgbm3t

Donors don’t remember what you asked for. They remember how you made them feel. No donor remembers your budget line. They remember the moment they felt seen. Last year, I worked with a mid-sized charity struggling with donor retention. Their appeals were beautiful — but donors weren’t coming back. When we looked closer, it wasn’t the messaging that was broken. It was the feeling. Or more accurately, the lack of feeling. Every email spoke at their donors. None spoke to them. So we rewrote their follow-ups. We started with: “You made this possible.” We ended with: “How did this story make you feel?” Within six months, repeat giving rose by 38%. Fundraising isn’t persuasion!!! It’s connection!!! Donors don’t remember the amount you asked for — they remember the moment you helped them feel part of something bigger than themselves. Before you send your next appeal, pause and ask: → “Where’s the feeling in this message?” → “Would I be moved to respond?” If the answer is no, start again. This is the philosophy that drives all my work: Fundraising is meaning, not money. AI, data, and strategy matter — but they should amplify empathy, not replace it. If you’re rethinking your donor strategy for 2026, start with how you make people feel. That’s where loyalty — and legacy — begin

Here are 7 ways you can "show, don't tell" in your fundraising copy. But first...why does it matter? Because of a psychological state called "narrative transportation." It's when we become so absorbed in a story, that we mentally step into it. Research shows that our imagination takes over—we picture the scene, feel the emotions, and experience the story as if we're part of it. We're not just reading copy...we're living it. And that sounds like something we want to invite our donors into in our fundraising copy. So here's a few techniques you can try today. --- 1. Zoom into a single moment Instead of describing a situation broadly, pick one moment that represents it. Telling: The hospital workers were exhausted. Showing: The nurse rubbed her temples, looked at the clock — 3:47 a.m. — and whispered, “I still have two more rounds.” Ask yourself: What was one thing that happened that proves this is true? Write that. --- 2. Use sensory details (but go easy) Touch, sound, sight, temperature. One or two is enough. Telling: The shelter was overcrowded. Showing: Every cot was taken, so new arrivals sat shoulder-to-shoulder on the floor, warming their hands around paper cups of instant coffee. Ask yourself: What could I see, hear, smell, or touch if I stood there for 10 seconds? --- 3. Quote people, and let them do the telling Real words from real humans are the fastest shortcut to showing. Telling: The family was grateful. Showing: “I didn’t think anyone cared about us,” she said as she tucked the food hamper under her arm. --- 4. Use “micro-scenes” and small slices of life You don’t need a full story. Just a slice. Telling: Donations like yours make a big difference. Showing: Because of you, Jamal walked into class with a backpack that didn’t sag open at the seams. --- 5. Replace abstractions with concrete nouns Avoid words like “dignity,” “support,” “opportunity,” “impact,” “food insecurity,” etc. Replace them with something you can touch. Telling: Your gift gives children dignity. Showing: Your gift gives Maya a clean set of clothes she can choose herself before school. --- 6. Use verbs that show movement Telling is static. But showing is active. Weak verbs: is, are, have, feel, struggle, etc. Strong verbs: lifts, carries, unfolds, whispers, pushes, hands, opens, etc. Telling: The storm damaged their home. Showing: The wind peeled the roof back like the lid of a sardine can. Try circling every “is/are/was/were.” Try swapping with a verb that has motion. --- 7. Start your paragraph in the middle of the action Avoid warm-up sentences. Drop the donor right into the moment. Telling: Winter can be hard for families without proper heat. Showing: By the time Elena smelled smoke, she had already piled three sweaters onto her son trying to keep him warm. Try cutting the first line of your draft. Most of the time, the real opener is underneath. --- Most fundraising appeals tell. But the best ones transport.

Your fundraising appeals keep failing for one reason. It's not your subject line. It's not your donation page. It's not your ask amount. It's not even your story. It's that you're talking about yourself instead of your donor. Count the words "we," "us," and "our" in your last appeal. Now count "you" and "your." If the first number is higher, you've found your problem. Your donors don't care about your organization's needs. They care about the impact they can make through you. The organizations raising more money aren't writing better appeals about themselves. They're writing better appeals about their donors. They don't say "We need your support." They say "You can change a life." They don't say "Our programs are effective." They say "Your gift creates transformation." They don't say "Help us meet our goal." They say "Your impact will multiply when you give today." Pull out your last three fundraising appeals. Highlight every sentence that focuses on your organization rather than your donor's impact. Rewrite each one to put your donor at the center. Because your appeals aren't failing because of poor technique. They're failing because you've made yourself the hero of the story instead of your donor. Fix that, and watch your response rates transform.

We think donors make giving decisions rationally. The research says otherwise. 3 counterintuitive findings that should reshape your fundraising: 1. Emotions drive decisions, logic justifies them • Donors decide with their emotional brain first • They use rational arguments to explain choices already made • Emotional appeals outperform rational ones by 2:1 2. Social proof matters more than we admit • Donors are 4x more likely to give when they see peers giving • "Join others like you" messaging outperforms "be the first" appeals • Testimonials from similar donors are more persuasive than expert endorsements 3. Choice architecture determines outcomes • The options you present shape decisions more than the case you make • Default options are selected 60-80% of the time • The presence of a "decoy" option can increase selection of your target option Smart fundraisers are applying these insights by: • Leading with emotional stories, following with rational support • Making social proof visible throughout the giving process • Carefully designing giving options to guide desired outcomes What unexpected donor behavior have you observed in your work?

When we speak to older donors about why they give (or don't give), one of the most worrying emotions we uncover is a sense of learned hopelessness - particularly when it comes to medical causes. "There have been so many false dawns - so many promises - I've given up hoping – it's too late for me." To help illustrate this, I've gone back through the advertising archives to show how for 125 years, fundraising advertising for cancer research was driven by the same promise - one day science will cure cancer. Then in 2023, Cancer Research UK did something different. Instead of promising future breakthroughs, they showed patients and researchers celebrating them RIGHT NOW. The result? A huge jump in legacy income. Are they related? I'd love to know more about the campaign. I don't work with CRUK. But to my mind, this is what happens when you understand donor psychology. From speaking with donors, here's what I think CRUK got right... – They didn't just show suffering – They showed success – They didn't ask for sympathy – They invited collective action – They didn't promise "one day". They said "today" And they weren't afraid of asking. The fact is no campaign – no brand – can ever land clean. When you start at a charity, you inherit decades of promises made by people who are long gone. You can rebrand all you want – new logo, fresh colours, modern fonts – but you can't escape the impact of generations of personal experience and appeal messages. CRUK acknowledged that history. And changed the narrative within it. From "one day" to "today." From promise to proof. From hopelessness to hope. Three things to learn from this... 1. Your long-term donors might not give because they don't care – they may have heard the same promise for decades and stopped believing it. 2. Brand agencies tend to think emotion = sympathy. But hope, pride, and collective efficacy are more powerful for sustained giving. 3. Stop separating "brand campaigns" from "fundraising campaigns." They're the same thing and should be doing the same job. This is what integration actually looks like. It's understanding why people give and what the barriers are - they are both important. If you want to find out more, there a detailed analysis in the comments where I look at advertising going back to 1899, focus on why we have to consider the power of collective action, consider why no campaign ever lands clean and share a number of lessons - for any charity on any budget. #Fundraising #DonorPsychology #charityBranding

𝗠𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝗻𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗿𝗮𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮 𝗷𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺. I learned this the hard way. At Food for the Hungry, we had a program model called 𝗖𝗙𝗖𝗧 — 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗱-𝗙𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. Brilliant work. Proven results. Life-changing outcomes. But would I ever put “CFCT” in a fundraising appeal? 𝗔𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁. Because donors don’t speak internal language. They speak human language. They don’t wake up thinking about “program frameworks” or “theory of change.” They care about children fed, families lifted, communities thriving. Here’s the rule I use: If a donor wouldn’t say it out loud… I don’t write it down. Cutting jargon does three powerful things: – 𝗥𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 (clarity increases conversions) – 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 (no one trusts what they can’t understand) – 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗽𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 (not the infrastructure) Your internal language is for alignment. Your external language is for generosity. 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻— 𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝘁?

A homeless shelter sends out two fundraising letters. Letter A says: "Your $100 donation provides emergency shelter and meals for someone experiencing homelessness. We serve over 500 people each month who desperately need a warm bed and hot food tonight. The crisis is growing. Please help…" Letter B says: "Your $100 donation helps people like James rebuild their lives. James used our job training program to earn his commercial driver’s license. Within 6 months, he went from sleeping in his car to driving for a local trucking company. Today, he has his own apartment and sends us a holiday card every year…" Which letter gave you more of a gut-level urge to give? Which letter do you think raised more money? If you said Letter B, you’re not alone. And you’d be right. But what’s most surprising is just how much more effective this shift in messaging was: 💰 3x more donors pulled out their wallets. 💰 The average gift jumped from $75 to $134. 💰 Total donations skyrocketed by 400% (!) This insight comes from groundbreaking research from Jonathan Hasford and his team, who call this the “autonomous aid effect.” They discovered that focusing on independence and long-term transformation—not just immediate needs—compels more people to give and give generously. Because when donors give, they want their money to create lasting change—not just put a band-aid on the problem. They’re moved by transformation, not just urgency. So, how can you apply this to your nonprofit’s messaging today? 🚫 Instead of: "Your donation feeds hungry families" ✅ Try: "Your donation helps families grow their own food through our community garden program." 🚫 Instead of: "Help us provide school supplies to children in need" ✅ Try: "Help students like Maria get the tools she needs to become the first in her family to graduate." 🚫 Instead of: "Support our job training program" ✅ Try: "Help determined people learn the skills they need to never need our help again." One homeless shelter in the study recreated their website, emails, and social media around this principle. Their donations have climbed year after year. Now, ask yourself: ❓ Does your website inspire donors to create lasting change—or just solve an immediate crisis? ❓Do your latest fundraising appeal emphasize immediate needs or independence? Crisis or transformation? Dependence or empowerment? This one messaging tweak can transform how donors see your organization—and how much they give. If you’re not 100% sure your messaging is doing this, it may be time to rethink it. P.S. If you want help revamping your messaging to inspire lasting change—and bigger donations—let’s talk. ___ 📌 This is the last of a series of 5 posts for nonprofits and nonprofit marketers about fundraising messaging hacks to kickoff the new year. Comment ME if you'd like me to send you the links to all five posts!

Before I write anything, I ask myself three questions. In this order. What do I want this person to feel? What do I want them to think? What do I want them to do? The order matters more than most people realize. Most nonprofit communications start with the action. Donate. Register. Share. Sign up. But if someone doesn't feel anything first, they're not going to do anything. They'll scroll past. They'll delete the email. They'll mean to come back to it and never do. Feeling creates attention. Thinking creates understanding. Action follows both. I learned this the hard way. I used to write appeals that were packed with information. Stats, program details, impact numbers. Logical, thorough, and completely forgettable. Because I was asking people to think before I gave them a reason to care. Now I start differently. Here's how I use the framework: → Feel: What emotion should this land with? Urgency? Hope? Frustration? Connection? Pride? If I can't name the feeling, I'm not ready to write. → Think: What do I want them to believe or understand after reading this? Not everything I know about the issue. Just the one thing that matters most for this moment. → Do: What's the one action I'm asking them to take? Not three options. One clear next step. When I map it out like this, I notice where the gaps are. Sometimes I've nailed the emotion but haven't earned the ask. Sometimes I'm asking for action without giving them anything to hold onto first. Here's a quick test you can run on anything you're about to send: 1. Read just the first two lines. Do they create a feeling, or just deliver information? 2. Look at your call to action. Have you given the reader a reason to care about it yet? 3. Ask yourself: if I removed the stats and the details, would there still be something that resonates? Take this opening: "Our organization served 2,000 families last year and we need your support to continue this important work." It's factual. It's fine. But there's no feeling. Compare it to: "Last Tuesday, a single mom walked into our doors not knowing how she'd feed her kids that night. She left with a week's worth of groceries and the number of a housing advocate. That's what your support makes possible." Same ask. Completely different entry point. The framework works because it mirrors how people actually make decisions. We feel first. Then we rationalize. Then we act. Try it on your next email, social post, or appeal. If something feels flat, check which step is missing. Usually, it's the first one. 💛