Why is it that the loudest voice in the room is taken the most seriously? Across many teams, visibility gets mistaken for impact. The ones who speak the most in meetings, announce with the most intensity, or post the most in Slack are often seen as the most “driven.” Meanwhile, the people doing the quiet, deep work that holds everything together often go unnoticed. Until they eventually leave and the gap is felt. Early in my career, I struggled with this. I had strong opinions but found it hard to speak over louder, more confident voices. Over time, I learned to prepare points in advance, send reflections after meetings, and contribute in ways that felt natural to me. But not everyone should have to fight for space in that way. Leaders should design systems that make room for quieter thinkers and reward contribution, not decibels and # of words spoken. If you notice this is an issue and want to fix it: → Make visibility a shared responsibility: leaders should spotlight others’ impact → Set meeting norms that protect time for reflection & brainstorming, not just time spent talking → Allow moments of silence to give space for people to think and speak up → In reviews, ask questions like “who helped you succeed?” -> it exposes unseen contributors If you want better decisions that include more voices, build environments where the loud don’t dominate and the quiet don’t disappear. -- #people #culture #hr #meetings #inclusion
Ways to Ensure Everyone's Voice is Heard
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
Hybrid Meetings ≠ Inclusive Meetings. I’ve lived it - and here’s 5 practical tips to ensure everyone has a voice, regardless of location. I spent more than 10,000 hours in hybrid meetings while as a remote leader for The Clorox Company. I was often the 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 remote attendee - while the rest of the group sat together in a conference room at HQ. Here’s what I learned the hard way: 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲... ...by showing who gets heard, who feels seen, and who gets left out. If you're leading a distributed or hybrid team, how you structure your meetings sends a loud message about what (and who) matters. 𝟱 𝘁𝗶𝗽𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗵𝘆𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀: 1️⃣ 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 – who will actively combat distance bias and invite input from all meeting members 2️⃣ 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗮 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲𝗿 – to monitor the chat and the raised hands, to launch polls and to free up the facilitator to focus on the flow 3️⃣ 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗴 𝗶𝗻 - so that there is equal access to the chat, polls, and reactions 4️⃣ 𝗕𝘂𝗱𝗱𝘆 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 – pair remote team members with in-room allies to help make space in the conversation and ensure they can see and hear everything 5️⃣ 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗽 𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘂𝗽 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻 – be ready with a Plan B for audio, video, or connectivity issues in the room 𝘞𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘧𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳? 𝗧𝗿𝘆 𝗮 𝗗𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹-𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴. If even one person is remote, have everyone log in from their own device from their own workspace to create a level playing field. 🔗 𝗚𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗽𝘀 for creating location-inclusive distributed teams in this Nano Tool I wrote for Wharton Executive Education: https://lnkd.in/eUKdrDVn #LIPostingDayApril
-
🌐 "How can we lead inclusive team meetings when our team is so widely distributed across timezones?" That's a question our #Inclusion Strategy team at Netflix has been reflecting on quite a bit lately – and that's surely not an issue we face alone. Here are some ideas that popped up as we put our geographically distance heads together to ensure that everyone has an equal opportunity to participate in discussions that are relevant to all: 1️⃣ Establish a Meeting Time Rotation: to ensure fair participation, create a rotating schedule for your meetings. This means alternating meeting times to accommodate different time zones, so that each team member has an opportunity to attend during their regular working hours on a rotating basis. 2️⃣ Consider Core Overlapping Hours: identify the core overlapping hours when the majority of team members are available. Aim to schedule important meetings during these hours to maximize attendance. This may require some flexibility from all team members, but it fosters a sense of shared responsibility for ensuring everyone's voice can be heard. 3️⃣ Prioritise Meeting Relevance: ensure that meetings are called only when it's essential for all team members to be present. Avoid scheduling meetings for routine updates that can be shared asynchronously, giving team members more flexibility to manage their schedules. 4️⃣ Create Pre-Meeting Materials: provide agendas, and key discussion points well in advance, so team members who cannot attend live sessions can still contribute their input asynchronously. This way, everyone can stay informed and engaged in the decision-making process. 5️⃣ Encourage Rotating Facilitation: consider rotating meeting facilitators to accommodate different time zones. This not only distributes the responsibility but also allows team members from various geographies to lead discussions and bring diverse perspectives to the forefront. 6️⃣ Use Inclusive Meeting Technologies: leverage virtual meeting tools with features like real-time chat and polling to foster engagement from all participants, regardless of their location. Consider having all meetings recorded by default (unless there's a compelling reason not to), streamlining access to the team immediately after each recording is ready. 7️⃣ Promote Open Feedback Channels: establish channels for team members to asynchronously provide feedback on meeting times and themes, and communication methods. 8️⃣ Acknowledge and Respect Personal & Cultural Differences: be mindful of cultural practices and observances that may impact team members' availability or participation. Strive to do the same about individuals' needs, too (like dropping kids at school). These strategies can help create an inclusive and equitable approach to meetings, enhancing the chances of all team members feeling valued and empowered to contribute. How else can you foster that? 🤔
-
"Inclusion" is often just a great sounding word or intention that doesn't translate to practice Real inclusion is not achieved by simply inviting people to the table. It happens when every voice is genuinely heard, respected, and acted upon. For too many organizations, inclusion stops at gathering ideas. But what happens next? Do employees ever hear back about what was discussed? Are their ideas prioritized, acted on, and followed up with feedback about the impact? Without these steps, “inclusion” is just a hollow promise. Here’s what it really takes: 👉 Gathering Ideas and Feedback. Inclusion isn’t just a checkbox; it’s about understanding people’s experiences and listening through surveys, focus groups, and team discussions. 👉 Providing Feedback on What’s Heard. Too often, feedback goes nowhere. Showing appreciation and sharing what was heard builds trust and shows that every voice matters. 👉 Prioritizing Ideas Together. Inclusion isn’t about saying “yes” to everything—it’s about focusing on what can make the biggest difference and working collaboratively to prioritize ideas...keeping everyone in the loop! 👉 Developing Action Plans with People. Many think inclusion is something leaders "give." But it’s about empowering people to co-create solutions that matter to them. 👉 Delegating Authority for Implementation Real inclusion is about valuing people for their ability to go and take charge of the actions. 👉 Providing Feedback on the Impact. Inclusion doesn’t stop once changes are made. Closing the loop by sharing results and celebrating success is essential to keeping momentum alive. THIS is the essence of respecting people. #Inclusion isn’t about saying the right things—it’s about doing the right things, consistently, until everyone feels they truly belong.
-
I am regularly asked this question: What are some practical ways you can help quieter people speak up in meetings, and draw out their valuable contributions? It’s an important question, because there are many reasons why people may not speak up. It is dangerous to assume that they have nothing to contribute. Some may feel that it’s rude to interrupt, feel anxious when under pressure to think on the spot, are unable to find a gap in a group of louder people, or have some other reason to not speak up. If you are a leader or chairing a discussion, there are things you can do to ensure quieter voices are heard. Here are three practical things that you can do at your next meeting: 1 Inform people of the discussion topic ahead of time. Quieter people can feel anxious and freeze up when put up on the spot. They may need time to think through things before sharing them. Providing background material beforehand allows them to be ready to share during the meeting. It is very likely their ideas will be well thought through and valuable. 2. Actively create space, especially if others are noisy. Quiet people can struggle to interrupt - they may feel it's impolite, need more time to interject, or their quieter voices may be drowned out. You can come up with a pre-arranged signal that people can use if they want to say something - such as a raised hand - and invite them to talk. You can also keep track of who has talked and who hasn’t, and invite anyone who hasn’t talked to do so. 3. Invite people to share things with you after the meeting. Just as quieter people may need time to assemble their thoughts before a meeting, they may think about things that were raised during the meeting, and have even more to contribute after reflecting. Invite people to talk to you some time afterwards. Then in the next meeting, bring up their contribution and invite them to share further. These three strategies are not overly time consuming, nor do they take much effort. However, they can have a significant impact on your quieter people feeling heard and included, and on how much value your organisation gains from their contribution. The ability to create space for quieter voices is an important inclusive leadership skill. Noticing and inviting quieter voices will likely add diverse perspectives to your discussions. How consciously do you create space for quieter people to be heard? #inclusion #listeningskills #management #inclusiveleadership #diversityandinclusion
-
🤐 "Dead Air" on Zoom? It’s Not Disengagement — It’s Cultural. 🌏 Your global team is brilliant, but meetings are met with silence. You ask for input, and… nothing. It’s not that they don’t care. It’s cultural. In many cultures, challenging a leader publicly can feel disrespectful. Speaking up might risk "losing face." So, instead of collaboration, you get cautious nods, and critical ideas die quietly. 💥 The cost? Missed feedback, hidden conflicts, derailed timelines, and talent feeling unseen and unheard. But it doesn’t have to be this way. 🚀 Here’s how to encourage real participation and build trust across cultures — starting today. 1️⃣ Invite opinions privately first. Many cultures value privacy and may hesitate to disagree publicly. Before the meeting, send out an agenda and ask for input by email or private chat. This gives team members time to reflect and feel safer sharing. 2️⃣ Create "round robin" sharing moments. During the call, explicitly invite each person to share, one by one. Use phrases like: "I’d love to hear a quick insight from everyone, no wrong answers." This reduces the fear of interrupting or "stepping out of line." 3️⃣ Model vulnerability as a leader. Share your own uncertainties or challenges first. For example: "I’m not sure this is the best approach — I’d really value your perspective." When you show it’s safe to be open, your team will follow. 4️⃣ Acknowledge and validate contributions publicly. After someone shares, affirm them clearly. For example: "Thank you for that perspective — it really helps us see this from a new angle." This builds psychological safety and encourages future participation. 5️⃣ Use cultural "mirroring" techniques. Mirror verbal and non-verbal cues appropriate to different cultures (e.g., nodding, using supportive phrases). Show respect for varying communication styles instead of forcing a "one-size-fits-all" dynamic. ✨Imagine meetings where every voice is heard and your team’s full potential is unlocked. Ready to stop the silence and turn diversity into your superpower? #CulturalCompetence #GlobalLeadership #InclusiveTeams #PsychologicalSafety #CrossCulturalCommunication
-
It’s off-site season… and here’s the uncomfortable truth: A slick agenda won’t make it a success ... if only five people do all the talking. Your ExCo won’t rave about it. Your team won’t remember it. And your bonus won’t thank you. My top tip. If you want people to speak up ans contribute, you have to design for it. Harvard Business Review (HBR) has said this for years. Meetings shape culture, trust, retention… and yes, your leadership reputation. If you don’t make meetings inclusive, they won’t be. We all know the 'usual suspects' who grab the mic first. But what about everyone else? The introverts. The new joiners. The shy-but-brilliant thinkers. The colleagues from minority or underrepresented backgrounds. The people whose first language isn’t English. They’re sitting on insights that could make your strategy sharper and your team stronger. Now here’s the kicker: HBR found that only 35% of employees feel able to contribute “all the time” in meetings. That's two-thirds of your team... sitting in silence. Imagine what that’s costing your business £$£? Imagine what it’s costing you. So here’s the fix. - Don’t go to the loudest voice. - Deliberately give the first question to someone who wouldn’t normally speak. - Agree it with them beforehand so it feels supportive, not like a live ambush. And yes ... the research backs this approach. Leaders who intentionally make space for quieter contributors get better ideas, stronger trust, and higher leadership ratings (Bain et al., HBR). You can also use tools like Mentimeter where people submit questions anonymously (in real time) and the room upvotes what they want answered. HBR’s been saying for years that anonymity boosts participation.... especially for introverts, multilingual colleagues and people dialling in remotely. The moment you do this, the power dynamic shifts. You signal that every voice matters. And slowly but surely, those who usually stay quiet start stepping in. Good facilitation isn’t about blasting through slides. It’s about creating a room where people feel welcome, valued, and confident to contribute. HBR calls it “inclusive meeting design”. I call it a smart career move. Because leaders who run inclusive off-sites? They get better ideas, better decisions, better feedback… and usually a better bonus. So when you run your next off-site or townhall… pass the mic with intention. Bring in younger colleagues, older colleagues, multilingual colleagues ... everyone with the different ideas your strategy needs. Talk soon, Annette P.S. was this a useful post? Worth sharing with someone planning their off-site right now?
-
Silence is not golden. When people don’t feel safe to speak up, it leads to disengagement, unproductive conversations, and stalled learning across the organization. Here are 9 proven strategies to create psychological safety in your meetings: ✅ Set a clear agenda ↳ Clarity from the start keeps conversations focused and productive. ⚡ Pro Tip: Include key decisions, assign ownership, and use timeboxes to stay on track. ✅ Share materials in advance ↳ Pre-reads respect neurodiversity and allow thoughtful preparation. ⚡ Pro Tip: Missed the deadline? Reschedule to ensure quality input. ✅ Encourage active listening ↳ Listening signals that every voice is valued and helps build trust. ⚡ Pro Tip: Summarize contributions to show understanding and respect. ✅ Solicit junior voices first ↳ This helps reduce hierarchy bias and brings forward new perspectives. ⚡ Pro Tip: Align with leaders beforehand to prompt their feedback later in the meeting. ✅ Add a roundtable discussion ↳ Give everyone structured time to contribute—no one gets left out. ⚡ Pro Tip: Begin roundtables with clear intentions and invite all to contribute. ✅ Be an ally ↳ Research shows men interrupt women 33% more often—let’s change that. ⚡ Pro Tip: Monitor interruptions and say: “Let’s allow [Name] to finish.” ✅ Hold comments until everyone has spoken ↳ Facilitators should withhold their opinions initially to encourage unbiased discussions. ⚡ Pro Tip: Use open-ended questions like, “What perspectives haven’t we discussed?” ✅ Normalize questions and feedback ↳ Celebrate curiosity and encourage constructive challenge. ⚡ Pro Tip: Thank team members for asking insightful questions. ✅ End with clear action items ↳ Summarize decisions, assign owners, and set deadlines for accountability. ⚡ Pro Tip: Follow up with an email or tracker to ensure accountability. Looking to build stronger, more engaged teams? These small changes can lead to big results. In fact, psychological safety is the #1 predictor of high-performing teams. (Google’s Project Aristotle) Have you ever been in a meeting where psychological safety was missing? What happened? Drop your thoughts below. 👇 ♻ Reshare to help other leaders build high-performing workplaces. ➕ Follow Morgan Davis, PMP, PROSCI, MBA for insights on achieving operational excellence. 📌 Reference: 🔗 Google’s Project Aristotle: https://lnkd.in/grvspMpK
-
Leaders, silence in a meeting is not the same as agreement. This post provides practical ways to build challenge into your processes. You ask, “Any questions?” No one responds. You assume the room is aligned. But silence often means people are: • Protecting themselves • Waiting for someone else to speak • Assuming the decision has already been made 📌 Save this before your next meeting. When concerns remain unspoken, risks surface after the decision instead of before it. The solution is not to ask for more participation. It is to redesign how the meeting works. Start with two foundational shifts. 1. Stop asking, “Any questions?” Ask questions that make disagreement easier: • “What concerns you about this direction?” • “What are we underestimating?” • “What would make this difficult to execute?” • “If this fails, what will we wish we had discussed today?” Specific questions surface better thinking than vague invitations. 2. Let the leader speak later. When the most senior person gives a strong opinion first, everyone else starts adjusting their answer. Ask the room to assess the issue before you share your conclusion. You need their thinking, not agreement with yours. Then build challenge into the process. Do not rely on people being confident enough to disagree. Use these three techniques: ASSIGN A RED TEAM For key decisions, give one or two people responsibility for: • Challenging assumptions • Identifying risks • Arguing the opposing case Their job is not to block the decision. It is to strengthen it. USE SILENT WRITING BEFORE DISCUSSION. Give everyone three minutes to write down: • The biggest risk • The strongest objection • The assumption that may be wrong • The question no one has raised Writing gives people time to think before stronger voices shape the conversation. END WITH A RISK ROUND. Before closing, ask each person to name: • One concern • One risk • One condition for success No passing. No debate until everyone has spoken. You can redesign the meeting perfectly and still silence the room with your reaction. Curiosity encourages the next challenge. Defensiveness prevents it. Redesign one meeting this week and pay attention to what people have been waiting to tell you. ♻️ Repost this for a leader whose smooth meetings may be hiding important conversations. ➕ Follow Diane Kucala and tap 🔔 for practical leadership insights that work.
-
Ever been on a team that's too quiet? Not focused-quiet. But hesistant-to-speak-up quiet. I once worked with a leader whose motto was: "Silence is 100% agreement." We would chuckle politely. Our silence wasn't agreement. It was fear. Here's what I've learned after nearly two decades coaching people leaders. People don't need to find their voice. They need to feel safe using it. Here are 6 ways to create that safety, without forcing anyone to speak before they're ready: 1. Listen to learn ↳ Pause before responding: "Help me understand your thinking on…" ↳ Reflect back: "Here's what I heard, did I get that right?" ↳ Let people know when their input reshapes your thinking 2. Build confidence before the spotlight ↳ Pair teammates as "thinking partners" to test ideas before meetings ↳ Use 1:1s to help less vocal members frame input as exploratory questions ↳ Normalize iterations. "What if we considered…" often sparks breakthroughs. 3. Model transparent communication ↳ Share your thinking: "Here's my view and why I see it this way…" ↳ Be open about uncertainty. It gives others permission to speak ↳ It's okay to change your mind in public when presented with strong alternatives 4. Facilitate solution-building sessions ↳ Ask: "What would success look like for everyone involved?" ↳ Use "Yes, and…" to build momentum, not shut it down ↳ Try brainstorm rules: build on others' ideas before introducing new ones 5. Disagree without making it personal ↳ Start with: "We're debating the approach, not anyone's expertise" ↳ Use neutral framing: "There are different perspectives here" ↳ Keep feedback focused on outcomes and impact, not personality 6. Make space for the quiet thinkers ↳ End with: "Let's reflect for 24 hours before deciding" ↳ Send pre-reads with clear reflection prompts ↳ Start key conversations with a few minutes of silent thinking When you shift from demanding participation to designing for it, you're not just changing meetings. You're redefining how power flows through your organization. How do you create space for insight that isn't loud? ♻️ Feel free to share if you're working toward conversations where every voice has room. ➕ If you lead people, this space is for you. Follow me, Michelle Awuku-Tatum for insights on: ↳ Human-centered leadership, resilient teams, and intentional culture.