Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

Page extended-confirmed-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:PERM)
"WP:PERM" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission or Help:Permanent link.
This page is under extended confirmed protection, but non-EC users may edit its subpages.
Requests for permissions
Shortcuts

This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 16:50, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Permissions

Handled here

  • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
  • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
  • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
  • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
  • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
  • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
  • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
  • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
  • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
  • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
  • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
  • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
  • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.
  • Temporary account IP viewer (add request · view requests): Temporary account IP viewers are able to view the IP address information associated with temporary accounts.

Handled elsewhere

Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

Review and removal of permissions

The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

Process

Requestors

To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting the permission.

Administrators

Full instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions

Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

Other editors

Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

Current requests

Account creator

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Autopatrolled

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Emmanbotan

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights: Hi. I make articles on Samoan flora, Especially endemic flora. I have only 1 deleted article which was then remade to be good article status, Flora of Samoa with help of Marshelec. Emmanbotan (talk) 03:09, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Thank you for your application and for your article creations. Almost all of your creations are stubs on plant species, which are generally considered to be automatically notable under WP:NSPECIES (and which pose very little burden for reviewers). These stubs provide very little perspective on how you evaluate notability outside of your primary area of expertise. If you were to expand your article creation to different topics and write a wider range of articles for us to evaluate, or if you were to participate at WP:AFD, that might provide more information for a future request.  Not done for now, however. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:38, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Bneu2013

Considering my extensive work and experience as a content contributor, including 28 good articles, 13 DYKs, two featured articles, two triple crowns, and many other articles created or greatly expanded, as well as experience reviewing GA and FA nominees. Another user recently commented here that they think I should be autopatrolled. Bneu2013 (talk) 03:39, 30 September 2026 (UTC) Bneu2013 (talk) 03:39, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

 Done Excellent content creation record and a review of your recent creations shows no issues. Thank you for applying! Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Ikan

I plan to replace archive.today or other deprecated archives with web.archive.org, for which AWB would be more than useful. 🐠 formerly U.T. 08:34, 14 September 2026 (UTC)reply

i’m not a permission granter person, but what makes AWB better for that task? — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 10:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC)reply
@Ikan, are you familiar with the stand alone tool mentioned in Wikipedia talk:Archive.today guidance#Links to other discussions and advice? If that doesn't meet your needs maybe open a topic on that page, I might be willing to enhance it. Dw31415 (talk) 02:16, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Very honestly: it doesn't fit my needs. I wish that I would be able to hunt for archive.today external links on other wikis; also, at many occasions it cannot find an alt, despite the alt exists (at another location, redirected). 🐠 formerly U.T. 02:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Note that this page is only for the right to use AWB on enwiki. Some other wikis let anyone use it, others have their own separate whitelists. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:43, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Pattersonuwu

Want to start with typo-fixing to get a feel for AWB, then do other things like creating talk pages and such :3 pattersonuwu njz (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:YusHau

I am requesting AWB/JWB access to assist with repetitive maintenance edits such as fixing wikilinks, formatting, and other routine cleanup. I understand that I am responsible for reviewing every edit and following the AWB guidelines. I am still building my editing experience and would like to use JWB carefully for appropriate repetitive tasks. YusHau (talk) 21:05, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Dw31415

I'd like to be able to help with simple requests like Wikipedia:Bot requests#Fixing the time zone and utc offset for Moroccan (and Western Saharan) places with User:Joeytje50/JWB. I've completed three approved BRFA tasks with User:DwAlphaBot and User:CutlassBot (89,530 edits). Dw31415 (talk) 01:08, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

 Done on the basis of your familiarity with the (semi-)automated editing policy, as evidenced by your prior experiences with BRFAs. Keep up your good work. Staraction (talk · contribs) 07:18, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Score Beethoven

I plan to semi-automate some typo fixes that I have already been making manually. I have completed several hundred of these edits, mainly removing incorrect spaces between the last word and the following punctuation mark.

I would like to request AWB/JWB access, as these tools would be very useful for handling this type of repetitive maintenance work more efficiently. My intended workflow is to identify the relevant cases, apply the correction, review the result, and save the edit.

I understand that I remain responsible for reviewing every edit and for following the AWB/JWB guidelines. I am still building my editing experience and intend to use JWB carefully and only for appropriate repetitive maintenance tasks. Score Beethoven (talk) 09:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Confirmed

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Thereturnof96

Reason for requesting confirmed rights Thereturnof96 (talk) 03:28, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

@Thereturnof96: Reason for declining confirmed rights voorts (talk/contributions) 13:21, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply
 Not done voorts (talk/contributions) 13:21, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:AlohaFromHawaii11

AlohaFromHawaii11 (requesting Confirmed) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions) Can I have confirmed rights? This is a legitimate alternate account. I would like confirmed becuase my normal account Bennett Li11, does not have the new editor dashboard and I would like to have the same “new editor dashboard” on this alternate accounts. Cheers, AlohaFromHawaii11 (talk) 01:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Please reply to User:Bennett Li11.
Cheers
AlohaFromHawaii11 (talk) 01:46, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
@Bennett Li11: Please confirm from your main account that this is your alt. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:25, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Nevermind, I see you've confirmed that on your userpage. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 02:27, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Event coordinator

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Akbarali

I am requesting event coordinator rights to organise and manage on-wiki events using the Event Registration tool. I am conducting different wikipedia workshops for teachers and students. I document these programmes on Meta-Wiki. I also coordinate editing activities that need participant registration and tracking. Akbarali (talk) 18:01, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Extended confirmed

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:The Regulator 1

I am requesting the restoration of my Extended Confirmed rights.

My previous request from September 6th wasn't approved by voorts based on generic claims ("This request seems LLM-generated to me" and "There are several AI tells in your request"), but when I explicitly asked what those tells were, no explanation or text examples were provided.

I need to state clearly again: I do not use AI. English is not my native language, and my use of dictionaries and Google Translate to verify phrasing is what triggers false positives on automated detectors. This is not the first time this has happened to me, and I face a lot of unfair suspicion on Wikipedia as a result. Ignoring a non-native speaker's explanation and leaving generic AI accusations unexplained does not align with community values.

A major reason I need this permission is to access the Content Translation tool. I have manually translated and created over 30 articles on this wiki, and not having this tool limits my ability to contribute.

I have carefully reviewed past administrator feedback regarding extended confirmed requirements after a revocation and implemented them before submitting this request. Following the expected standard, I have focused strictly on manual, constructive work in the mainspace. Since losing the permission (at around 560 edits), I have made over 570 additional manual, documented, and productive edits in the mainspace, bringing my current total to over 1,130 edits.

My recent notable contributions include researching and creating Non ædificandi from scratch and expanding Impasse Florimont, which was manually cleaned up, reviewed, and upgraded to B-Class status.

I am NOT using LLMs. I am a REAL human editor who wishes to continue contributing to the English Wikipedia, and I am asking to please restore my Extended Confirmed rights.

Thank you. The Regulator 1 (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days () and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days (). — MusikBot talk 12:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
I rarely use LLM detectors. I'm not sharing what the tells are because then you would know how to avoid them. Another admin will evaluate this request on its merits and see if I was wrong. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:58, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Also, you don't need XC to translate articles. You can translate to draft and then move the page to mainspace yourself or submit it through AfC. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:47, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Can you please contribute without the use of a translation tool? Sufficient English competence is required to edit on the English Wikipedia. If your English is not good enough to write articles or talk with other editors without the use of translation tools, I would suggest editing on your native language's wiki. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
(Non-administrator comment) Based on my impressions, it looks like this user probably wrote the request by hand in their native language, and then used an AI translation tool to translate it to English. Maayaaaaa (talk) 13:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

File mover

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Mass message sender

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

New page reviewer

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Equivalent-Text2598

I have now done quite a lot on AFC and reviewed quite a few articles, showing that I understand content policies. Furthermore, if you look at my interactions, you can see that I have always acted civilly and resolved any disputes. From my Counter Vandalism Work, you can see that I always inform a user when I revert their edit; the same happens with AFC (through the AFC helper).

I would primarily like this role as a counter-vandalism tool so that I can remove pages that are obviously vandalism, as I think that this is an important thing to do. I would also review other pages in order to help ease the backlog.

I would finally like to thank anyone who reviews this request.

Cheers,
Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 07:14, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 07:20, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply
based on your AFC track record, conferring for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply  Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:37, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
@RosguillThank you very much. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 19:41, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Haggis MacHaggis

hi, I would like to renew my NPP rights witch are about to expire. Different articles were reviewed over the last month, often after I added additional refs, images, or added/rephrased some text. After my adjustments, a few articles also got reviewed... by others :o) _regards Haggis MacHaggis (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Dclemens1971 (expires 00:00, 1 October 2026 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 18:30, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Haggis MacHaggis, can you comment on your reviews of 418 (film), Sleepwalk (album), The Legend (2005 film), The Tank Man (2004), Dead Company, Sky Scrappers? signed, Rosguill talk 14:04, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Suriname0

I had temporary rights during the backlog drive. I did very little NPP reviewing, but I did pull several articles out of the NPP feed during other normal editing activities (i.e. while editing other articles and looking at linked articles, or via related edits on my Watchlist). If granted the right permanently, I suspect I would use it ~twice/month. If NPP reviewers are expected to review at a higher volume, please decline this request. Otherwise, I'm happy to review ~twice/month! Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 02:46, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

many hands make light work, track record looks good,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:05, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Sevenstxrsquid

Recently was notified that my NPP rights are expiring. Would like to renew them, please. Sevenstxrsquid 🌊 11:51, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 1 October 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 12:00, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply
track record looks good,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:09, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Chao Garden

My NPP perm expired, and I would like to renew it.

As an aside: I just noticed that I don't have a Draftify log properly set up, so I'll fix that. While I had temporary NPP rights, I draftified one article (see: ). Another editor helpfully demonstrated that the old page needs to be deleted after draftifying (per WP:CSD#R2), which I'll do myself next time. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 01:05, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

 Done, track record looks good. signed, Rosguill talk 15:17, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

User:LordVoldemort728

I have granted this right for three times for short time. 1, 2 and 3

I qualify for NPPCRITERIA.
1: I have been editing for 4 years, 7 months and 6 days and made 17,300 edits.
2: I have reviewed many articles at AfC and very active in AfD. I also write articles (stub) for politician outside North America and Europe (for which I got barnstar), particularly politicians from Africa and India.
3: I don't qualify for this now but I greet new users earlier (for which I got barnstar).
4: I have never been blocked.
5: I am committing to reviewing pages solely on a volunteer basis ONLY. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 02:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Norellia.sh

I had been granted NPP in the past so that I may serve in the September 2026 Backlog Drive. I am re-requesting NPP permissions so that I may continue working on the NPP queue. I quite enjoyed my time working on the backlog drive, and got a good number of reviews done. I am also currently an AfC reviewer, and have worked on a large number of articles within the AfC queue. Thanks in advance :) 「Norellia.sh」(talk) 18:16, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Page mover

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:EditorShane3456

I am a probationary AFC reviewer, and a moderately experienced speedy delete requester, page mover would help me draftify articles that do need them (small, low amount and reused sources). shane (talk to me if you want!) 19:31, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

When requested for draftification, I generally want the requester to first have permanent NPR permissions, rather than temporary AfC. WP:R2 is a straightforward criterion for admins to check, so for occasional use there isn't much need to have page mover, and your most recent draftifications needing R2 have been one each in September, April, March, January. I see you have installed MoveToDraft, so I recommend just using that for now.  Not done. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 20:41, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:AriuCH

I would like page mover rights to draftify weak new articles created in mainspace that still have potential for improvement, especially when doing NPP. AriuCH (talk) 21:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

 Not done, not enough experience with moving (10 distinct moves, not counting simultaneously moving the talk page as separate) and only recently acquired temporary NPR permissions. (I recommend the WP:MOVETODRAFT user script, which will automatically nominate the redirect for speedy deletion under WP:R2 and notify the creator, after also checking whether it's within the recommended time per WP:DRAFTNO and WP:NPPHOUR.) ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 20:01, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:CROIX

I usually edit low-to-mid traffic mainspace articles relating to Antigua and Barbuda. According to XTools, I have moved 447 pages across all namespaces. I have been moving pages since June 2021 and I have experience with both requested moves and technical requests. Given the nature of this topic (virtually always involving low-impact requests) and my multiple years of experience with page moving, having this permission would speed up my work. CROIXtalk 01:27, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Robloxguest3

Hello! I have been wanting for a long time to be a pending changes reviewer. I do a lot of AfC work and some GAN work. I can tell if a edit is good or not. If there are any questions, feel free to ping me or something. Robloxguest3 (talk) 22:19, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

I think Robloxguest3 is a good candidate for pending changes reviewer. Solid decisions at AfC. You never notice it because there is nothing wrong with it. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:26, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
 Done DanCherek (talk) 01:49, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

User:EzYop

Hello I would like to have pending changes reviewer rights, I routinely edit on my account with 500 edits in the past 3 weeks. I also have never participated in vandalism and routinely make productive edits. I have read Policy On Vandalism, Policy On Copyright, and I understand that I must obtain a neutral point of view and the guideline on reviewing. I request these services to help me expand my reach and find new ways of editing and helping Wikipedia. My limited services right now mainly include linking articles and welcoming new users. Thank you for your time and generosity! EzYop (talk) 01:58, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:PeterCooperJr

I sometimes run into articles with pending changes while monitoring recent changes, and it could be helpful to be able to accept or decline them. I already have Rollback rights. Thanks. PeterCooperJr (talk) 02:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Ivebeenhacked

Hello, I'm Ivebeenhacked. I have about 16,900+ edits and am familiar with the Wikipedia policies highlighted in WP:PCCRITERIA. I edit almost everyday in Wikipedia by correctly reverting vandalism, disruptive edits, and am competent in correcting incorrect information in articles. I'm confident I can be a great reviewer. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:59, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Rollback

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Jabba550

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I would like to use huggle to revert vandalism in a quicker manner as i find wp:twinkle a bit too slow sometimes and would like too see if I would prefer huggle or other similar editing tools. Jabba550  | ✉ in solidarity 13:52, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Baberoothless

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I’ve been an RC patroller for better part of a year now. Rollback rights will help me counter vandalism more effectively, especially when I have to undo contributions of editors with a disruptive editing history, editors with single-purpose COI accounts, and editors who have been blocked. I’d also like to use the suite of tools that rollback rights come with including CVPI and Huggle. I will not use rollback rights to settle content disputes (I don’t get into many either way). I hope that my main space contributions so far, and my experience with the platform + RC patrol will attest to my intentions. Thanks! Baberoothless (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Celjski Grad

I'd like rollback rights in order to make recent change patrolling easier with tools such as Interceptor. Celjski Grad (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:16dvnk

I am planning to use WP:Interceptor and I believe rollback would make reverting vandalism more efficient. I believe that I meet the recommended (edited) criteria listed above. Thank you for processing my request! 16dvnk (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Sksatsuma

Previously had this as a temporary right for fighting vandalism with Huggle. Had a bit of a wiki-break but keen to revisit this. Thanks! sksatsuma 14:19, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Strongshorts

Reason for requesting rollback rights Hi, I would like the rollbacker right to more efficiently fight vandalism. As it is required for many counter-vandalism tools such as Huggle. I have experience in Recent Changes patrol. I also have moderation experience elsewhere. Thank you, Strongshorts (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC) Strongshorts (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Automated comment This user has 170 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 16:00, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

User:CharlieRidesRollerCoasters

I am requesting rollback rights So that AI Model articles can be as high quality as possible CharlieRidesRollerCoasters (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

(non-administrator comment) Rollback is for more efficiently reverting vandalism and access to more advanced anti-vandalism tools. It is not for improving articles, nor any "AI Model articles". Thanks. 16dvnk (talk) 08:21, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

User:DocLG

I would like rollback to handle obvious vandalism more efficiently. I enjoy monitoring for spam, unconstructive edits, and talking to/notifying newer editors . I have read WP:ROLLBACK and will not use the default rollback summary on good-faith or disputed edits. Thanks. DocLG (talk) 22:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:LuigiMcpe4549

Hello again! My name is LuigiMcpe4549. I would like to request rollback rights. That is because I have done some good edits and revert some vandalism on Wikipedia. I think that it is useful in case of crazy vandalism. It's ok if my application is denied again like last time. Cheers! :) LuigiMcpe4549 (talk) 15:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Justcgi

I'd like to have rollback permissions so I can utilize tools like AntiVandal to help out with recent changes patrol. Justcgi (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Automated comment This user has 165 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 20:10, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Template editor

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Temporary account IP viewer

Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:PeterCooperJr

While doing recent changes patrolling, I've occasionally come across multiple changes to the same page from different temporary accounts, and thought it might be helpful to be able to determine if they were from the same IP in order to properly report them. PeterCooperJr (talk) 22:51, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

 Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 06:55, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Saadrafiq4

I spend quite some time on recent changes patrolling. There have been instances where I noticed a pattern of similar edits repeatedly being done by different temporary accounts. Just recently saw a similar pattern which was also block evasion. I think this ability would be very useful in even better reporting and countering vandalism. — Saadrafiq4 (talk) 14:19, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

 Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:00, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:A Wondrous Raven

When I look through recent changes I sometimes see multiple TAs vandalising a page in a similar manner; this right would be helpful to properly report them. I agree to use it in accordance with the Foundation's guidelines. – a wondrous raven (talk) 05:29, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

 Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:01, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:MathMan4

I do a good amount of vandalism reverting, which some of the vandals that I deal with are multiple different temporary accounts vandalising pages in short periods of time. It would be nice to know if they are using the same IP address, so that why I can appropriately report the vandals to AIV. I promise that I will not inappropriately use the tool. MathMan4 (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Spiderone

I have been editing here for 20 years with a clean record. Nowadays, I mostly work in anti-vandalism and anti-UPE. In line with that, I do a lot of work at SPI. I feel that this right would help make sure that my SPI and AIV filings are accurate before submitting them. I assure you that this right won't be used for any purpose that is contrary to the terms. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

I'm surprised that you didn't have TAIV yet. (Read: strong support) 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads 19:13, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Jako96

I'm experienced in reverting & reporting vandals, so I think having this right would allow me to investigate more edits done by the same vandal (or disruptive editor), or maybe reporting multiple TAs of the same person. Jako96 (talk) 13:51, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

User:Sirfurboy

I have brought a number of sockpuppet investigations, and also been involved with some LTAs using a set of IP ranges. I think one of these has returned, but can't bring informed AIV or SPI cases as I cannot tell which of the socks this relates to. Likely to be useful in future SPI and LTA abuse at AfD too. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:53, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions&oldid=1303932167"