User talk:Fuindion

April 2023

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hyundai Card, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Oh yeah I forgot lol. give me a sec Fuindion (talk) 13:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fuindion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

It appears to be somebody in my dorm was banned from editing on Wikipedia, I believe I have been banned from doing so as well because we share the same IP (the one provided at our dorm building) Fuindion (talk) 22:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You will need to tell us your IP so we can investigate this. If you don't want to post it publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide it privately. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julio Ramón Aguilera Marciales (August 26)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Zalaraz, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

WP:INSTAGRAM

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Julio Ramón Aguilera Marciales to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Zalaraz (talk) 02:11, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Fuindion! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! Zalaraz (talk) 02:11, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Julio Ramón Aguilera Marciales

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Julio Ramón Aguilera Marciales, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zalaraz (talk) 02:11, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

Advert and COI warnings

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to a subject about which you have written on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 05:08, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Julio Aguilera Marciales

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Julio Aguilera Marciales, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 08:17, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Julio Aguilera Marciales

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Julio Aguilera Marciales requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 05:28, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

I've amended the G15 request, this is very obviously AI-generated and meets the speedy deletion criteria in several ways. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:37, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

To be entirely clear, this is not AI at all. It is getting ridiculous that you are continuing to hound me; ever since I replied to you earlier, you have clearly taken it personally and hold a grudge, and now magically every single edit I make is suddenly being labeled as automated output and pushed for speedy deletion. You are completely failing to tell the difference between a real human writer and a machine, and your biased campaign against my work is just wasting everyone's time. Drop the vendetta and stop falsely flagging legitimate human contributions. Fuindion (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

September 2026

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to

• Parallel Trips
• Mergers and acquisitions in United Kingdom law
• Nicolae Mămăligă
• Jackson, Rhode Island
• Parallel Trips

Your edits have been reverted because LLM-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:16, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Hello gurkubondinn, Thank you for bringing this to my attention, but I want to clarify that no large language model or AI tool was used in creating or editing the page for Parallel Trips. The content was written entirely by me, relying on my own independent research and drafting. It is frustrating to have genuine, human-crafted contributions mistakenly flagged and reverted as automated output. Please review the edits again or let me know specifically what raised concerns so we can resolve this. I kindly request that my contributions to Parallel Trips be reinstated.

-Fuindion Fuindion (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Please do not lie, the edit to Parallel Trips was generated. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:24, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Look at the actual edits, they build and contribute to the articles properly and are entirely legitimate human work with real, manually researched sources, not vandalism. I did not use any AI tools, and doubling down and calling me a liar after I've spent weeks working hard on this is completely baseless. Please stop policing valid contributions and wasting everyone's time.

-Fuindion Fuindion (talk) 14:27, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

If you continue using AI to edit Wikipedia, like you did when you edited the Theater an der Rott article, you may get blocked. The English Wikipedia does not accept AI-generated material, this is prohibited by the WP:NOLLM guideline. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:22, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Hello gurkubondinn, I have not used any AI or LLM tools whatsoever, and I am deeply offended by these repeated, baseless accusations. I am simply submitting all the original articles I have diligently worked on and researched over the last two weeks myself. Dismissing genuine human writing as automated output without any actual proof is completely uncalled for. Please stop making false assumptions and harassing me over legitimate contributions.

-Fuindion Fuindion (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you edit Wikipedia using a large language model, which is prohibited. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:38, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Dismissing authentic human contributions and legitimate sourcing as automated output while threatening blocks over false presumptions creates an unproductive barrier for editors trying to contribute in good faith. You act like every editor using an AI or a clanker is out to get you, but you cannot tell the difference between a real person who has spent their entire life writing this way and actual automated text. Please review the actual content and formatting of the pages rather than making blanket assumptions about human writing styles. Let us focus on constructive collaboration instead of policing valid work. Fuindion (talk) 14:39, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

AIN notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:AI noticeboard regarding your edits. The thread is User:Fuindion. ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:58, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

The harrasment is am dealing with is absolutely outrageous. Fuindion (talk) 16:04, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

September 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently misusing large language models and denying your LLM misuse when the issue was raised, as described in the AI noticeboard discussion (permalink).

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  — Newslinger talk 16:20, 17 September 2026 (UTC)