User talk:Arjayay

E-mails

You can use "Email this user", but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.

Broadcasted

The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is sometimes proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B

Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".

A September 2026 search for Broadcast gave over 215,500 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 119.
Of these, 15 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles and 6 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are in quotations or reference titles.

---

---

Request for your opinion on Sacnilk reassessment

Hi Arjayay, as you’re involved in Indian cinema/box-office-related editing, you may be familiar with some of the sourcing issues around these figures.

It took me quite a lot of time to gather the information and put together this reassessment of Sacnilk.com. Your opinion would be really, really helpful, so I’d appreciate it if you could take a look when you get a chance: Reassessment of Sacnilk.com.

Thanks! Tonyy Starkk (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the helpful copy edit catch at article, 2004 Gaza Street bus bombing. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 12:21, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Hartford

The guy who moved it to draft space is out of his league. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:42, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Have a look

Hi, do you think this is OK? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi Fylindfotberserk - I think that it is contrary to the standard consensus. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:40, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for a quick look at Draft:Nagarukhra

Hello Dear Arjayay,

I hope you are doing well. I am reaching out to thank you for the copyediting and formatting clean-ups you recently performed on Draft:Nagarukhra. Your help is deeply appreciated. ​Since you are already somewhat familiar with the page, I wanted to kindly request if you might have a moment to take a final look at it. The draft is currently in the AfC pending queue, and I have tried my best to follow all guidelines regarding references and tone. If you feel it meets the criteria, would it be possible for you to review and accept it, or let me know if any further changes are required? ​I completely understand if you are busy or prefer that I just wait for my turn in the regular queue. Thank you again for your time and previous help! ~~~~ Skype7 (talk) 16:26, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi Skype7, thanks for your post. As I am not a Wikipedia:New page reviewer, I can't review the page, and, having made several large edits to it, it would be inappropriate for me to do so, even if I was a "New page reviewer", as that would be like marking my own work. I suggest you wait your turn. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 20:55, 30 September 2026 (UTC)