The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20230419154028/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.12103
Volume 52, Issue 2 p. 354-370
Original Article
Full Access

Instrumental and Constitutional Differentiation in the European Union

Frank Schimmelfennig

Corresponding Author

Frank Schimmelfennig

Centre for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich

Correspondence:

Frank Schimmelfennig

European Politics Research Group

IFW D 45.1

Haldeneggsteig 4

8092 Zürich

Switzerland

email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Winzen

Thomas Winzen

Centre for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 November 2013
Citations: 72
This article originates from a research project on ‘Differentiated Integration in Europe’, co-directed by Katharina Holzinger (University of Konstanz) and Frank Schimmelfennig (ETH Zurich) and jointly funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). It has benefited from discussions with our colleagues in the project: Thomas Duttle, Sabine Jenni and Thomas Schäubli. For their support in coding the data, we further thank Claudia Baumgartner, Laura Gies, Sebastian Müller, Anna Reimann, Olga Sierocinska, Mario Trost and Dagmar Zakopalova. For comments on earlier versions, we thank Andreas Dür, Klaus Armingeon and audiences at the European Political Science Association's 2011 and the Swiss Political Science Association's 2012 general conferences, and the anonymous reviewers.

Abstract

Differentiation has become a salient feature of European integration. Yet systematic empirical evidence is lacking about its origins, duration and variation across countries and policies. This article provides such evidence from a new data set on differentiation in European Union treaty law. In addition, it is argued that two logics of treaty-based differentiation are at work. ‘Instrumental differentiation’ originates in enlargement and is motivated by efficiency and distributional concerns. ‘Constitutional differentiation’ has its origins in treaty revisions and is motivated by concerns about national sovereignty and identity. It is driven by Eurosceptic Member States that are opposed ideologically, or fear popular resistance, to the supranational centralization of core state powers.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.